Peripheral Vascular Surgery Society |
|
|
|
|
#3 COST EFFECTIVE AORTIC EXPOSURE: A RETROPERITONEAL EXPERIENCE.
Jeffrey L. Ballard, MD and J. David Killeen, MD
Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA.
Hypothesis: That the surgical approach to infrarenal aortic
aneurysm (IAA) repair significantly affects in-hospital morbidity and
cost.
Study Design: Consecutive series of 96 patients with elective
repair of an IAA by two vascular surgeons using an established
protocol from 3/95 to 3/99. This study compares 50 patients with
transperitoneal (TP) exposure to 46 patients with retroperitoneal
(RP) exposure.
Setting: University hospital, tertiary care center.
Main Outcome Measures: Hospital and ICU days, perioperative
complications and cost.
Results: All patients followed the same protocol except for
intraoperative aortic exposure. Preoperative carotid and cardiac
screening, intraoperative use of a Swan Ganz catheter, mannitol 12.5
gm bolus before aortic cross clamping, low dose dopamine, judicious
use of postoperative fluids and preadmission patient education
regarding early ICU and hospital discharge was accomplished in all
patients.
There was no significant difference between TP and RP groups with
regard to demographic features (all p values >0.30), mean IAA size
(p=0.41), or mean operative blood loss (p=0.89). Incidence of
postoperative complications was similar between the groups (11 in TP
and 6 in RP; p=0.25). However, a trend without statistical
significance was noted in the incidence of pulmonary complications (7
in TP and 2 in RP; p=0.10). Mean ICU days (4 vs. 2; p=0.004) and
hospital days (10 vs. 6; p=0.005) were significantly longer for TP
aortic exposure compared to the RP approach. There was one (1%)
perioperative death in the TP group and four (4%) late deaths in the
series (mean follow-up; 17 months). Three of these were in TP group
and one was in the RP group (p=0.62). Mean total hospital cost was
significantly reduced for patients having RP IAA repair compared to
TP IAA repair, primarily due to decreased ICU and hospital days (mean
cost difference = $4,659; p=0.016).
Conclusions: Retroperitoneal exposure for IAA repair is
associated with decreased pulmonary complications, significantly
shorter ICU and hospital days and significantly decreased hospital
cost compared to transperitoneal aortic exposure. This suggests that
in the future, RP exposure for IAA repair should be the benchmark for
comparison of any new techniques.
Last Updated 5/28/99